Because everyone loves a good story
The scent of crucifixion—sweat, filth, blood—
is mixed with spikenard, perfume of a king.
Those fresh-anointed feet, now nailed to wood,
still smell as beautiful as news they bring.
The wretched masses lift their eyes above
to see the Curse now lifted up, undone.
The serpent bites His heel; eternal love
ordains a nail to crush both snake and Son.
Mary Magdalene is at His feet,
her eyes as parched as Jesus’ throat. Then He,
with final cry, declares His work complete.
Like dove from cage, He sets His spirit free.
They pierce His side and see His body bleed.
The guards report His life finished indeed.
Then Mary watches as they heap with myrrh
the body of the Lamb, now shorn of breath.
A stone secures the mouth of sepulcher.
The Sabbath lingers silent, still as death.
Before the sun can rise and shine its light,
she comes to seek the Lord among the dead.
But guards lie lifeless next to men in white
declaring He has risen as He said.
She’s dazed until the Gardener speaks her name.
That smell of myrrh and spikenard, and that voice—
She turns and clings to Jesus’ feet. A flame
of faith consumes her doubt. Mary, rejoice!
This Lion-Lamb, a Root and yet a Seed,
though slain and sown, now stands risen indeed!
Sometimes it seems like my mom is the last of a dying breed.
This woman grows and cans her own veggies. Like, lots of veggies. She makes jellies, jams, and homemade bread. She uses cast iron and whole wheat. But also, she sews. And knits. And spins wool into yarn to knit with it. And for a while, she raised the goats to get them shorn so she could spin the fiber into yarn and knit a sweater out of it.
Reinventing the wheel is her forte.
Furthermore, she scrubs her wooden floor on hands and knees. She actually reads and heeds the Farmer’s Almanac. She wakes up before the sun every day. If sheer determination counts for anything, she will outlive us all.
And me? Well, not to brag, but I’ve canned apple butter a couple of times.
Know what’s crazy? The fact that living like my mom seems crazy to us now, when even twelve-year-old girls could do all of that and so much more just over 100 years ago. The times, they are a-changin’. So last time I gave you a quick rundown of the Little House plots, but today I want to showcase the inspiring (and unattainable) lifestyle of the Ingalls family—specifically, their character qualities, manners, and work ethic.
Keep in mind that these stories are set around the 1880’s. That’s just over 140 years ago…a mere blip on earth’s timeline. But it’s amazing to read about the way the Ingalls’ family spent their days and the skills they took for granted.
When I was in middle school, my parents built their own house. Now, when I say that, I obviously mean that they bought the supplies and asked friends, family, and professionals to help construct the building. But when Pa Ingalls built a house, he alone chopped the trees, cut the logs, constructed the walls, framed out the windows and doors, made a fireplace and chimney, and even created a door on wooden hinges. And this was just the first house he built. He proceeded to build a new one each time they moved.
And they moved a lot.
Ma Ingalls was able to use every square inch of any slaughtered animal. She cooked three square meals a day from scratch, whether over a fire, on a rudimentary stove, or in a fancy cast iron oven. She sewed all their clothes, both functional and ornamental. She made sure the girls were on track with their academics at home. She cleaned the whole house every day, even making sure to sweep the floors—the dirt floors.
And she trained her girls to help with all of this while they were still little. Wise woman.
The Ingalls family didn’t have much, but they used every molecule of every supply. They made head cheese out of animal scraps and even ate the pig’s tail. They wore clothes until they were threadbare, and then they sewed them into bedsheets. They made Christmas gifts for each other out of old buttons, ribbons, and even the feathers of a swan that Pa accidentally shot. And their resourcefulness bred thankfulness—good weather, enough food, and a warm house were seen as the blessings they are.
Laura and her sisters knew what was expected of them from their earliest years, and they usually didn’t waste time in protest. The children couldn’t speak at the table unless Ma or Pa asked them a question first. Girls also weren’t supposed to run, talk loudly, or draw attention to themselves. Instead, they were expected to murmur, wear corsets, keep their bonnets on, and never complain. I like to imagine the Ingalls watching an interaction between parent and child in the candy aisle of Walmart today. What a learning experience that would be.
Ma and Pa were expected to remain calm and reasonable at all times. They didn’t show emotion by crying, raising voices, using strong language, or even expressing surprise, fear, or alarm. Ma didn’t like chit-chat or speculation because discussion doesn’t change facts. While their manners seem stoic to the point of unhealthy today, they got one thing right: they respected each other. They never betrayed disappointment or distrust in each other, even when it was warranted. Now that’s admirable.
Discipline was just a way of life for the Ingalls family. They were up with the sun for chores and housework. They cooked, cleaned, worked, and studied all day. Laura worked extra hard to qualify for a teaching certificate. She memorized the whole American History timeline as well as mastering mental long division, sentence parsing, spelling books, and countless orations. She got her first teaching job at the age of 15.
Let’s not talk about what I actually remember from high school, ok?
Despite different personalities and struggles, the Ingalls family really did enjoy each other’s company. Since the kids didn’t expect to act out and get away with it, their household was orderly and peaceful. Because Ma and Pa didn’t waste time nagging each other, their relationship brought security. Although they lived in near-isolation for many years, they didn’t resent the lack of outside relationships.
This blissful state of affairs may have been more common back in the 1880’s, but it certainly wasn’t universal. Laura contrasts her family with several others throughout the series—disrespectful and disobedient children, angry wives, miserable husbands, and unhappy families. But thankfully for Laura, the Ingalls family valued each other and the resulting peace.
While this antiquated lifestyle may seem impossible to recreate today, let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. The times, they are a-changin’, but we can choose what to preserve. I mean, if homesteading can make a comeback, why not industrious habits and respectful families? It’s worth a shot.
And hey, if worse comes to worse and your crops are consumed by critters or your biscuits are burnt, you can still sit back in your recliner while Grubhub delivers your deep dish pizza. After all, it’s 2022. There’s no need to live like cave men.
When I first began reading the Little House series, I didn’t expect much from it. I’m all for great kids’ books, as you know, but I wouldn’t say I get hooked on them very often. Harry Potter and the Anne of Green Gables series are a few notable exceptions, but I had low expectations for a main character who was neither magical nor impishly precocious.
That’s why I was surprised to find myself staying up late to read just a few more pages. I needed to see what happened to Laura’s doll, how their crops turned out, and whether they’d had a nice Christmas. In short, I was hooked.
What is it about this old-timey autobiography that kept me reading all nine books? (That’s right…NINE books. That’s 2,784 pages.) Was it the straightforward writing style laced with vivid imagery? The nostalgic feeling of the Old West era? The description of everyday tasks that we’ve completely lost the ability to perform? The swiftly-moving timeline from Laura’s childhood to her marriage?
Well, yes. It’s all that, and yet the series is more than the sum of its parts. It would have to be. When you can summarize nine books with the sentence, “A family moves a lot, and life is exciting but hard,” there must be more to the series than meets the eye.
To me, the books were both inspiring and frustrating. I was inspired by the family’s character qualities, expectations, and work ethic, but I was frustrated by their isolation and motivation. I plan to wax eloquent on these topics in the next two posts, but let’s start with a super-brief overview of the books.
By the way, if you’ve been meaning to read the books, you may want to tackle them now to avoid my “spoilers.” (Although does it really qualify as a spoiler if the books have been available for 90 years and you still haven’t read them? Just asking…) If you never plan to read them, no problem. These posts will still have something to offer you. Read on, my friend.
Set in the early 1870’s, the first book of the series begins with the Ingalls family living in the woods of Wisconsin near extended family. Some of Laura’s best memories come from time spent there with grandparents and cousins. The book is basically a description of everyday living back then, but it’s fascinating because we’ve lost nearly all of those skills less than a century later.
In 1874, Pa Ingalls decides to move his family to Kansas so they can start a homestead. They have no family and virtually no neighbors except one bachelor over yonder. Building a house and making a living is hard, and then they all get malaria and nearly die. To top it all off, they hear that the Army is coming to evict everyone in the area because, legally, it’s still Indian territory. They pack their wagon and leave their painstakingly-built house behind.
Set in 1860’s upstate New York, this book follows the daily chores and capers of Almanzo Wilder, the boy who grew to be Laura’s husband. The Wilder family is settled and successful, but it’s incredible to see how much work goes into maintaining their farm. Also, I can’t believe how much food that boy consumed—the descriptions of his snacks and meals will have your stomach rumbling.
In 1875 the Ingalls family moves from Kansas to Minnesota near a small town. Laura and her sister Mary go to a real school for the first time and are right on track academically, thanks to Ma. The family lives in a dugout while Pa builds a real house, planning to pay for the supplies with the profit from his crops. Sadly, grasshoppers consume every piece of foliage in the vicinity, bury eggs to ensure next year’s destruction, and fly off. There goes the profit and the farm.
Most of the Ingalls get scarlet fever, and Mary is left permanently blind from the infection. In 1879, Pa decides to move them to South Dakota so he can work in a railroad camp while looking for a new homestead in the area. Laura is fascinated by the ingenious construction of the railroad, and Pa eventually lays claim to the perfect plot of land.
The winter of 1880 was a doozy. The Ingalls family abandons their “claim shanty” for the season, staying in Pa’s storefront in the nearby town instead. The girls go to school until the blizzards become constant. Then they, like everyone else, stay home and try to survive seven months of arctic weather. Almanzo Wilder, who also lives in town, risks his life to buy wheat for the starving residents. Even so, the Ingalls nearly freeze and starve and go nuts, but they manage to survive until spring comes in May.
After that winter, Mary moves to a college for the blind in Iowa. Unfortunately, the crops that would have paid for her tuition are eaten by a plague of blackbirds. Laura feels pressure to study hard and become a teacher to help pay for Mary’s college. She’s pretty stir crazy until the town starts a monthly literary society. Almanzo Wilder also starts escorting her home from events, although Laura seems oblivious of his motives. Finally, she earns her teaching certificate and gets her first job lined up.
The book begins in 1882 as Laura leaves home for her first teaching job twelve miles from home. It’s a miserable situation, but she endures until the end of the term. Almanzo drives his sleigh to pick her up every Friday so she can spend the weekend at home. They continue to court for a while, and then he pops the question and she demurely agrees. When he finishes building their new house, the couple gets married and moves in.
Laura Ingalls Wilder didn’t actually publish this book. After her death, a collection of notes was found and published, but maybe it shouldn’t have been; it’s a dismal end to a lovely series. Tragedy follows tragedy—lost crops, the death of a baby, diphtheria, drought, debt, deadly tornadoes, house fire, and the list goes on. Honestly, I might have skipped this one if I’d known. The Wilders did end up moving to Missouri later on and making a successful living, but that’s not included in this book.
See what I mean? “A family moves a lot, and life is exciting but hard.” It’s not the what of the books that draws you in; it’s the how. Even though I outlined the plot skeletons, the soul of the books is much richer. Next time I’ll share a few things that really impressed me about the Ingalls’ lifestyle, but you can form your own opinion before then. They’re quick reads, so if you’re interested, check out the books or audiobooks. I think you’ll find it’s time well spent. It’s certainly more worthwhile than growing crops for grasshoppers or blackbirds. Until next time, friends!
“Mom, why is God invisible? When we die, do we go right to Egypt where God lives? I’m a robot t-rex, but I’m pretty friendly. Do you wanna race me? OnYourMarkGetSetGo!”
Just a day in the life of my son. Really, he has more in common with Calvin than I’m comfortable with.
I’m finding out that little boys are made of pure energy, and their energy blasts like a juggernaut in whichever direction their attention is focused at the moment. You can’t keep up with them, and you certainly can’t leave them alone. Then, out of nowhere, they can hit you with a question you’re scrambling to answer. By dinnertime, the question you want answered is, “How long until bedtime?”
No wonder Calvin’s mom always looked haggard.
Imagination, exploration, and investigation—three cardinal pillars of childhood, and three major themes of Calvin’s childhood. Check it out to see if you can relate.
When it comes to active imaginations, Calvin’s takes the cake; this kid can’t keep his mind on reality for more than a frame or two at a time. And we wouldn’t have it any other way. He’s a dinosaur, he’s two-dimensional, he’s smaller than a bug, his hallway rug is a flying carpet, a cardboard box is a scientific machine, his front yard is a canvas for macabre snowscapes. Seeing inside Calvin’s mind is like getting a sneak peek into the brain of any little boy. It’s crazy, cluttered, creative, and hilarious.
His imagination also brings us some of our favorite characters: the gritty Private Eye, the heroic Stupendous Man, and especially the intrepid Spaceman Spiff. Calvin and Hobbes wouldn’t be the same without these alter egos. With a wink and a nod at classic comic books, these strips are a mixture of satire and homage.
And, as I mentioned last time, the detail of Bill Watterson’s illustrations is always light years ahead when Calvin is pretending. His classroom is a boring compilation of desks and blackboards. His house offers the standard sofas, tables, and beds. His imagination, however, presents a fully-detailed prehistoric panorama. The surface of an alien planet is a vivid expanse. The animals Calvin sees in his mind are way more realistic than his own parents. And isn’t that how it feels when you’re six? Hats off to Watterson for capturing the visual aspect of Calvin’s imagination.
To explore or to loaf—that is the question.
Another way in which Calvin depicts a normal, modern kid is his relationship with both nature and TV. To hear him talk, you’d think Calvin would be content to sit in front of his bulky old television watching pointless re-runs all day. He knows it’s drivel. He’s disappointed with the quality and content. His good buddy Hobbes points out the many shortcomings of that mindless entertainment. But given the chance, Calvin would park his little booty in front of the screen and consume endless hours of shows and endless bowls of Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs.
In this, I think he’s like most kids. Easy entertainment is just that—easy.
But the good news is that Calvin’s parents love him too much to let his brain turn to oatmeal. His mom kicks him out the front door—often literally—and out into the fresh air. Summer, winter, spring, and fall, Calvin is catapulted out into nature. And you know what? Once he’s out there, he (usually) loves it.
Some of my favorite Calvin scenes happen when he’s outside playing with Hobbes. Watterson remembers just what childhood is like outside. It’s full of puddles and bugs, snowballs and sand boxes, tree forts and forests. Calvin and Hobbes are always careening down some treacherous hill or other, clinging for dear life to a wagon or a sled. Inevitably, the bottom greets them with brambles, brooks, or boulders. But does that stop them from doing it again the next day? Of course not. And that’s childhood—contemplating the meaning of life on the way down but coming away with bruises instead of wisdom.
Which brings me to the final pillar of childhood—investigation. It may seem like Calvin’s head is full of dinosaurs, comic books, and mischief, but there’s a deeper side to him as well. And nothing brings metaphysical questions to the forefront like Christmas. How good does one have to be to merit Santa’s favor? And what is “good,” for that matter? Is good what you do, or is it who you are? Is it actions or intentions? When a litany of of gift ideas is at stake, even Calvin is willing to wrestle with Christmastime ethics.
But, as Calvin admits in one strip, he has the same questions about Santa as he has about God. Why all the secrecy and mystery? What’s the point of everything if he doesn’t exist? As adults, we’ve probably had time to consider conflicting worldviews, but it’s all new to kids. Ergo, the mind-bending theological conversations I have in the van with my three year old.
Kids see the world objectively. Anything is possible to them, but they want to know why. Things we take for granted or gloss over, kids want to examine and dissect. Calvin is no different. In the end, he often settles for the consolation of friendship. When nothing else makes sense, a big hug from Hobbes puts life back in perspective.
It sure isn’t the whole truth, but I can think of worse ways to live.
I have loads of respect for Bill Watterson. Unlike many cartoonists, he stopped writing the strip before he’d beaten the idea into the ground. And also unlike many cartoonists, he refused to license his characters for merchandise or film. He felt that it would be selling out for profit. Instead, he kept his characters where they belonged—in their own wonderful, imaginative world where they live on, reminding us of the magic, misery, and mystery of childhood.
Thank you, Bill Watterson. And thanks, Calvin and Hobbes.
Today I shall embark on a deeply academic subject—one so universal that you’ve no doubt given it much thought. It’s so complex that a professor could spend decades dwelling on it, and yet it’s so simple that a child can comprehend it perfectly. It’s primal, sophisticated, imaginative, scientific, and nostalgic. I’m writing, of course, about Calvin and Hobbes.
My husband and I love Calvin and Hobbes. I’ve always kept a couple of the books in my bathroom in case anyone needs a little, er, inspiration. (Is that T.M.I.?) But guess who needs daily inspiration now? My three-year-old son. He requests Calvin every time he’s on the potty. Sure, some of the vocabulary is over his head (intrepid, noxious, gelatinous…that Spaceman Spiff is pretty erudite), but he can still track with the stories just fine.
A little too well, actually. We got him a fuzzy Calvin blanket for Christmas, along with a few more comic books. The blanket shows Calvin and Hobbes pretending, playing, and exploring around a big tree. It’s beautiful. Later I asked my son if he liked the picture on the blanket, and he said, “No, not really. I like Calvin better when he’s being naughty.” Figures.
So what makes Calvin and Hobbes one of the most beloved, timeless comic strips? In my opinion, it’s because Bill Watterson’s work captures the essence of childhood a way that everyone can relate to. To begin with, the illustrations are genius. The drawings perfectly depict Calvin’s facial expressions and action shots. Always goofing off, always on the move—a true boy. The illustration style also highlights his daydreams. What Calvin sees in the “real” world is basic compared with the elaborate detail of his imagination.
The content is classic, too. Calvin’s best friend is a stuffed animal, and the girl next door has cooties. He detests his mom’s home cooking and prefers “Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bomb Cereal” with extra sugar on top. He looks forward to Christmas and dreads the start of school. He’s a terror to the babysitter and a mess at home. Basically, he’s a normal, healthy kid.
Everyone who’s been to school can relate to Calvin’s first-grade experience. You remember the way that time drags on during lectures or the sheer panic that hits you when the teacher calls you out of a daydream. You’re more apt to imagine your desk is a dinosaur than to pass your math quiz. And why did everyone else’s lunch seem so much better than the stuff in your own paper sack?
The school scene is also full of childhood archetypes: long classes, short recesses, lost homework, the harried teacher, the grim principal, and the bully with an overactive pituitary gland. No wonder Calvin disguises himself as Stupendous Man and makes a break for it. Hey, it was worth a shot.
Things at home usually aren’t much better for our little red-clad friend. His sadistic mom makes him do homework, play outside, and take baths. She won’t let him eat endless cookies, borrow chainsaws, drive cars, or do anything else remotely interesting. Calvin’s dad is always out to “build Calvin’s character,” which usually amounts to tedious chores or family camping trips gone wrong.
So clearly Calvin’s parents aren’t much comfort. The only friend who understands Calvin is a dangerous but lovable tiger, and even he causes trouble more often than not. Calvin can’t seem to catch a break. Any six-year-old can surely relate, and any sixty-six year old isn’t likely to have forgotten, either. Childhood is a grab bag of magic, misery, and everything in between, and few things capture that truth better than Calvin and Hobbes.
And that’s the beauty of Watterson’s comic. No matter who you are, where you were raised, or what’s changed since these comics came out in the mid 1980’s, you’ve got to chuckle at Calvin’s capers. And it’s even better because, while Calvin has to start school again every fall, it’s always first grade. The kid never ages! It’s like reading Peter Pan without the heart-wrenching ending. Really, it’s what we’ve always wanted—to look back on the imaginative parts of childhood with nostalgia and the difficult parts with insight. It’s with good reason that Yoda observes, “Truly wonderful the mind of a child is.” They can be miles deep in imaginative play one moment and then ask you the most baffling philosophical question the next. In this, Calvin is no exception. And that, my friends, is what we’ll be talking about in my next post. See you then!
Since my wedding, I’ve been making photo books as a gift every Christmas. No, not scrap books with stickers and mementos and sentimental Band-Aids and such. Just online photo assembly that gets printed and shipped. But honestly, I’ve made several of each style, and I almost think the scrapbook is easier. Maybe my next job should be a consultant for how to make online photo book assembly more user-friendly. (My first suggestion: arrange the uploaded photos CHRONOLOGICALLY!)
But there’s one blessing about the hours and hours and hours of time spent poring over every picture from the past year: I get to remember. This year as I sifted through thousands of photos, I vividly remembered the emotions behind them, the stories going on in the background, and the miraculous things God has done.
If you tracked with Past Watchful Dragons through 2021, you know it was a doozy of a year for my family. I was expecting our second baby, and just before Christmas 2020 we found out that her stomach appeared abnormal in an ultrasound. Our midwife explained several possible causes, some less concerning and some more so. (Lots of happy memories that Christmas, but lots of fear in the background of each picture.)
We pursued follow up testing and learned that our little girl had a blockage that prevented her stomach from passing fluid. We wouldn’t be able to have a second home birth, our baby would need surgery, and she’d have to stay in the hospital for a while. (Pictures of us having fun with our clueless two-year-old son who wondered why I cry every time we talk about the baby in my tummy.)
The baby came early, and God gave us a safe and speedy delivery. We named her Evangeline Sparrow because we wanted her story to spread the good news of God’s love and care for even the smallest life. (Pictures of our fragile little Sparrow hooked up to all kinds of tubes and wires. Thankfulness, sadness, and fear behind my smiles in the hospital.)
God allowed for a successful surgery and a long recovery. We were told to expect as little as two weeks before we were discharged, but it ended up being two months. (Countless pictures of our tiny girl sleeping in our arms in hospital chairs. So many pictures that look the same but carry different connotations of the procedures or updates from that week. A couple of them still make me feel like hyperventilating.)
Meanwhile, our son was having a blast with friends and family who so willingly stepped in to play with him while we were visiting the NICU. We made the most of our time with him when we were home, and while he may have been confused about how little he saw us, I know he made great memories during those months. (Pictures of the three of us on a carousel or playing in the snow between hospital visits. Memories of my fear that we weren’t being good enough parents.)
But the best time was when our sweet Eva finally came home. (Pictures of smiles that can’t capture the shock and relief that we were finally busting out of there.) What a sweet memory when she could finally come home to meet her brother and stay with us forever. In that moment with NICU behind us, we were an invincible, inseparable family. (Pictures of pure, untarnished, sleep-deprived joy.)
The months that followed were full of crazy stress as we navigated Eva’s medicine schedule, hospital checkups, and health concerns. Add to that Isaiah’s desire to get our attention by displaying that he inherited his mama’s strong will. (Pictures of Eva’s first smiles and Isaiah loving on his sister. Memories of how worn thin I was as I tried to keep them both alive all day. My standards were pretty low for a while there.) But we were together, and that’s what we’d been praying for.
Pictures of the passing weeks reminded me how thankful I was. I may have been stressed and tired, but I was so, so happy. We were able to drop Eva’s medications one at a time until the seemingly-endless rounds of pumping, feeding, medicines, washing, and repeating slowed down to a normal pattern of nursing. That was a monumental milestone.
And Isaiah learned how to be a big help and a big ham. That guy can always make us laugh with his insights, questions, and faces. He’s a precocious weirdo, and we have so much fun with him. Popsicles on the swing, walks to the playground, swimming in the pool, romping in the mud, trips to the orchard, eating snow—life with a toddler is a (tiring) blast.
This wasn’t how I expected 2021 to begin, but I am so thankful for the way it ended. I’m thankful for the countless ways that God showed His love to our family. And I’m thankful for pictures that remind me of the way small, daily graces trickle into an ocean of peace. It was a good year after all.
Yes, but isn’t this a literary blog? Do I plan to write about family as often as story? Has my identity shifted from scholar to mother? The short answer is, “Meh, kind of.” I’m finally in a place where I can read a bit in the evenings if the kids stay asleep, and that fills up the void in my brain where big thoughts used to live—thoughts that didn’t center around meal planning, dirty diapers, and mountains of laundry. I’ve polished off a decent stack of books in recent months, and I have some bookish posts in the works that I think you’ll really enjoy.
But the fact is, I’m a mom now, and mom stuff takes up a lot of my time. Sometimes I’ll probably write about that stuff, trusting that you’ll be patient with me in this season of life. After all, it’s the daily minutia that really make up our lives anyway. Hopefully you’ll find some of it relatable.
And on that note, I’ve got some daily minutia to take care of now, so I’d better wrap this up. I hope you can see God’s hand at work throughout your past year, too. If you have a hard time remembering the specifics, try making a photo book. Or, better yet, make a scrapbook, and don’t forget the sentimental Band-Aids. Happy New Year, my friends!
What makes the plot of Pride and Prejudice more appealing than its Highbury counterpart? And what’s the difference between Emma and A Comedy of Errors? As you may have guessed, I have a theory about both. Read on to find out in this final installment of the series. (Woo-hoo!)
I first read Pride and Prejudice in high school. On my own. For fun. Yah, I was that kid—no TV and an overburdened bookshelf. But I’m glad I read the book before watching the movie because I got to savor the storyline. I’ve since watched and enjoyed a few movie versions, and as predictable as Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy’s union seems from my present vantage point, it’s still a lovely bit of work.
It has all the charm of a rags-to-riches tale without wallowing in the privations of the rags portion. The delight of seeing two stubborn people bend their wills to see life from a new perspective is satisfying, and their change is so gradual that it seem almost believable. The happy ending is unmitigated (although I wish more ill had befallen Wickham and Lydia). For those reasons and a great many more, I love the story of Pride and Prejudice.
I first read Emma in high school after finishing (and loving) Pride and Prejudice. Even then I could feel the difference. I squirmed as I read about the frivolous lives of the characters, with their matchmaking and dances and picnics and gossip. Yes, I know that Elizabeth Bennet’s life was comprised of much the same stuff, but as I mentioned last time, Emma lacks the consolation of a sensible heroine and so leaves me feeling adrift in a sea of misunderstandings.
When I had to study the book in college, I learned that Austen was often being satirical about her society and its values. That made me feel a little better, but it didn’t increase my enjoyment of the book. At that time, Jane Eyre was my jam, and Emma felt shallow by comparison.
But even now that I’m older and oh-so-much wiser, I still can’t say I enjoy the story of Emma. At least on the first perusal I was free to grit my teeth at the characters alone. Now that I know what’s going to happen, I also find myself exasperated at the blunders and misunderstandings. Instead of providing the usual humor of situational irony, it gives me situational anxiety instead. But someone must enjoy this style because movies abound with this same plot. It’s just not my cup of tea.
The dialogue and writing style of Pride and Prejudice is golden. Little gems of wit glitter in every chapter. The first line alone is iconic: “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a great fortune, must be in want of a wife.” But every chapter boasts enough humor and truth to fill all the literary quote coffee mugs you’d like. Well done, Ms. Austen.
I do admit that Emma has some quotable lines, but the writing style feels more stilted to me. Maybe it’s because it was such an early book for Austen and she was still discovering a more natural, flowing style. Whatever the case, many of the lines that seem mug-worthy feel a bit forced, like Austen was inserting a previously-crafted thought (here’s looking at you, Mr. Collins). But my real beef with the writing style of Emma is the magnitude of tedious dialogue. Inane conversations are written out word for word, question for question, page after page. The reader could have gotten a full picture of the situation in half as many words.
Which leads me to my takeaway. As you know, both books are comedies. They end with weddings and are full of blunders and capers throughout. Shakespeare himself often used this formula to great success. But the major difference between my enjoyment of A Comedy of Errors and Emma is one simple factor: brevity. Sure, P&P can’t be read in an hour either, but it doesn’t feel as laborious to me because I get lost in the story. Emma, however, contains almost 40,000 words more than Pride and Prejudice, and I’m willing to bet that most of those were spoken by Miss Bates.
The manageable length of a Shakespeare play makes the misunderstandings humorous instead of claustrophobic. Had Austen turned Emma into a three-hour play, I could have borne it much better. That’s probably why the movie versions of Emma are much more enjoyable for me. The characters are still aggravating, but the brevity allows for laughter, knowing the pain will be over soon. In my humble opinion, the point of Emma could have been made just as effectively in half as many pages—in fact, the point would have been better served.
And yes, I fully realize this is the pot calling the kettle black. I am verbose in the extreme. Please accept my apologies.
Now I’ve said my piece. Heckle me if you’d like. In fact, if you’ve tracked with me through this brief mini-series, you’ve earned the right to heckle. Also, if you’ve stuck with me this long, I thank and congratulate you. I hope my musings have helped you clarify your own opinions about these books, even if they’re polar opposites of mine.
So, until next time, I hope you have a wonderful holiday season! Here is some sage advice from Miss Elizabeth Bennet, and I hope you’ll be able to use it in 2022: “Think only of the past as its remembrance gives you pleasure.” Merry Christmas and happy New Year, friends!
Add a comment, and join the conversation!